Welcome t0 RUEX News
(IRS) has been significantly affected by recent federal worker mass firings, with the agency being one of the hardest hit. Last week, the process of laying off over 6,000 employees, including both new hires and newly promoted staff, began across the country. The timing of these layoffs is especially problematic, as they are occurring during the peak of tax season, a critical period for the agency’s operations. This move has raised concerns about the potential negative impact on the tax season, particularly when it comes to delays in refunds and tax credits for taxpayers.
Danny, the former IRS commissioner who served under President Biden, is someone with intimate knowledge of how the IRS functions. He recently shared his insights regarding these mass firings and their implications for the IRS and the tax season. His experience at the agency provides valuable context for understanding the potential consequences of these decisions.
Danny expressed strong concerns about the layoffs, explaining that they will likely have significant detrimental effects. According to him, the IRS plays a central role in the U.S. government’s financial system as the primary source of revenue collection. By cutting the IRS workforce, the government risks both reducing the agency’s ability to collect revenue and decreasing cost efficiency. The IRS is responsible for collecting the taxes that fund federal government programs and services, making it essential to the functioning of the country. Cutting the workforce, particularly during tax season, could lead to lower tax collections and decreased efficiency in processing returns, ultimately hindering the government’s ability to fund its operations.
Furthermore, Danny warned that the layoffs could lead to delays in processing taxpayers’ refunds and distributing tax credits. This is especially concerning during tax season when many Americans rely on timely refunds to manage their finances. Delays in these services would not only frustrate taxpayers but also undermine trust in the system and the IRS itself. This disruption could lead to a ripple effect that affects the entire tax filing process, from taxpayers to the agency’s staff and the government as a whole.
Danny also addressed the stated reason behind the layoffs: cost efficiency. While the idea of reducing government spending may sound appealing on the surface, Danny questioned whether this approach is truly beneficial in the long run. He pointed out that, in business school, it is often taught that an organization’s financial health depends on both cost and revenue. In the case of the IRS, cutting the workforce responsible for revenue collection can ultimately harm the government’s financial standing. Lower revenue collection would not lead to overall savings but would instead reduce the funds available for essential government programs and services.
As for Danny’s own departure from the IRS, he explained that he stepped down from his position as commissioner on President Trump’s inauguration day, even though his term was set to run until 2027. He chose to step down in order to avoid becoming a distraction during the transition between administrations. By resigning, Danny allowed the new administration to appoint its own commissioner without disruption, ensuring a smooth transition within the Treasury Department and the IRS. His decision to leave was made in the interest of supporting the transition process and maintaining the efficiency and stability of the IRS during a time of political change.
Danny’s insights also highlighted the personal impact of the layoffs on IRS employees. He emphasized that IRS workers are not just faceless bureaucrats but are everyday people who serve as part of their communities. Many of these employees are veterans or members of military families, working in small towns, suburban areas, and cities across the country. These workers are deeply committed to the IRS mission of ensuring tax compliance, despite the often-unpopular nature of tax collection. The idea that cutting the IRS will somehow lead to lower taxes is a misconception, according to Danny. In fact, the role of the IRS is critical in ensuring that taxes are collected fairly and accurately, and that government services are properly funded. Reducing the IRS’s ability to do this will not result in lower taxes, but will likely lead to inefficiencies and increased challenges in managing the nation’s tax system.
Danny also expressed concerns about the broader approach being taken by the current administration in terms of handling federal agencies, including the IRS. While he acknowledged that there is always room for improvement in government operations, he warned against dismantling the progress that has already been made. The IRS, like many government agencies, has made substantial strides in reducing fraud and waste, and these successes should be built upon rather than undone. Danny urged the administration to work collaboratively with the existing employees within the government, leveraging their experience and expertise to continue improving the system. Instead of eliminating staff and resources, Danny advocates for new ideas and input from outside sources to complement the work being done within the agency.
Read more: Resignations and Uncertainty Sweep Federal Workforce Following Musk’s Email Ultimatum