The American gymnast has continued her fight to overturn the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s decision to get her bronze medal back from the 24th Paris Olympics by filing an appeal in Switzerland’s Federal Supreme Court, citing that the metal used was too hard, her lawyers announced in a statement on Monday, September 16. Jordan’s bronze medal was reallocated in August, meaning officials appealed the results of the women’s extra final to the International Gymnastics Federation.
Jordan’s score was changed, as she challenged the difficulty of part of her routine. The Court of Arbitration for Sport announced shortly after that the American gymnast’s original score would stand. Jordan’s coach decided to check her difficulty score, resulting in her bronze medal finish, which was filed a few seconds late, Now the 23rd world’s lawyers are saying Monday’s appeal is a continuation of the quest for justice, as they believe the quest for justice for the bronze medal continues. CS claimed procedurally deficient in their decision and in part firstly CS violated Charles’ fundamental right by refusing to consider video evidence that showed their investigation was convened in a timely manner.
The conclusion and was in direct contradiction to the CSS decision, secondly the entire statement is proceeding improperly because Charles was not properly informed that Hamid GG Vari is the chairman of the CF panel. Who deprived Charles of the bronze medal and awarded it to a Romanian gymnast instead, he had a serious conflict of interest Mr. Jabbar has served as counsel for mania for nearly a decade. In fact was representing Romania at the time of the arbitration given these undeniable deficiencies, Charles asked the Federal Supreme Court to reinstate the score he rightfully earned on the floor and the Jordanian council further stressed in the final release.
The appeal is about more than just the bronze medal and noted that her filing of the appeal has been supported by the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, which also found a letter of support for her appeal USA Gymnastics has also declared its support for the gymnast, releasing its own statement on Monday Jordan’s lawyer Murray K AM said that the Jordan trouser appeal presents a simple legal question facing the international community. Who would ever stand with an Olympic athlete, who has only done the right thing, being stripped of her medal due to fundamental unfairness in an ad hoc arbitration process.
Every party, including the Olympics, must stand up for fairness. Monday’s news follows the twenty-three-year-old choking in Forbes Power Women last week she discussed the situation, saying things were taken from you, knew what was taken from you. I’m the greatest, now everything was seen from me, it was. It was recognition of who was that I could be that person on the night of not only my sport but my purse. I’m everything that’s happened to me it’s not about the mental it’s about. he knows the color of my skin it’s about the fact that there were things that led up to this situation of being an athlete and I felt like everything was sent away. I felt like when I was back to being a teenager where I lost the level of play I’m Austin again.
I just felt like there wasn’t a lot of people out there supporting me that I felt could have supported me in that situation that could have helped me I didn’t feel like I was really left in the dark. Why do you feel like you were left in the dark because of that. You mentioned being at eighteen and and maybe a little bit about what that moment meant in terms of what caused that port to lose love and recognition from the sport and so many respects that how that moment potentially created. I’m not that good Yeah so back then and eighteen I was in a position of dealing with a coach who emotionally and verbally abused me I didn’t have the ability to use my voice or be heard.